People are using a lot of online language translation apps. What are the advantage and disadvantages of it?
Inventions have changed the style of living as compared to earlier times and mobile apps are the crucial ones. Many people are using apps to translate languages, as it is trouble-free way to do work efficiently. This method is helpful but it has both merits and demerits, however in my opinion its disadvantages are less superior.
The most prominent advantage of using these apps is that it is easily available and accessible. For example, many people are shifting to other countries for doing business there and such apps helps them to learn multiple languages . Similarly, international products have the language of the country from where they are manufactured and to understand the lables, one can simply scan those lables on app and translation will appear.
As every coin has two sides, it also have some drawbacks. There has been a considerable decline in the demand of language coaches and bilingual tutors, as people these days do not want to spend hours in classes and likewise they avoid to waste money on classes because most of the apps free. Due to this most of the teachers and professors are jobless and shifting to other walk of life.
To conclude, i would say that it is incontrovertible fact that online language translation apps are extremely beneficial for us and clearly their supremacy outweigh the drawbacks. This shows that in future, these apps will continue to benefits the community.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-13 | Kanika Aggarwal | 77 | view |
- Some people think that government is wasting money on art and this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 77
- Do you think English will remain global language despite globalisation Discuss your views with an example 77
- Some people think that the teenage years are the happiest times of most people s lives Others think that adult life brings more happiness in spite of greater responsibilities Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 77
- Involvement of youth in crimes is increasing at an alarming rate Throw some light on the causes and possible solutions 77
- Many people believe that countries should produce food for the whole population and import as little food as possible To what extent do you agree or disagree 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s helps them to learn multiple languages . Similarly, international products have ...
^^
Line 5, column 38, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
... As every coin has two sides, it also have some drawbacks. There has been a consid...
^^^^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... to other walk of life. To conclude, i would say that it is incontrovertible f...
^
Line 7, column 197, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...outweigh the drawbacks. This shows that in future, these apps will continue to benefits t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 236, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'benefit'.
Suggestion: benefit
... in future, these apps will continue to benefits the community.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, similarly, so, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1187.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 236.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02966101695 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7904239542 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60593220339 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 373.5 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7947315359 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.909090909 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304203684501 0.242375264174 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986789685109 0.0925447433944 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727911222815 0.071462118173 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169779920742 0.151781067708 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589207747231 0.0609392437508 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.