People dispute travel is or is not a component of a quality education. Some believe travel is overrated. What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of traveling for education and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of enhancing knowledge is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that considering all opportunities can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, traveling to different places can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of acquaintance with new cultures, are crucial. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of boosting skills via communicating with new people. Thus, beneficial ramifications of visiting new regions are visible.
Within the realm of science, overtrading instead of utilizing modern facilities can provide the community with negative impacts that are related to the reality that the demerits of spending time and energy for visiting new places are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has described the role of information technology in improving education. Hence, predicted outcomes of educational TV channels and the internet are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of traveling and learning new things far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of increasing commutative skills prove the significance of learning abilities, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-19 | PTE STUDY | 79 | view |
| 2022-02-27 | Behnaz fallah | 77 | view |
| 2022-02-27 | Behnaz fallah | 77 | view |
- You need to study climate change Which aspect of climate change will you choose and why Use examples 88
- Do you think English will remain to be a global language despite globalization 85
- Because university degrees can get jobs with higher salaries university students should pay full cost for their education Do you agree or not 85
- Media make people lose contact with real life do you agree or disagree 88
- Taking part in sports is important for an adult s health and happiness To what extent do you agree with it 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.756 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.268 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0311413427 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.818181818 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117228859014 0.242375264174 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405667696664 0.0925447433944 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461511067765 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0649752432436 0.151781067708 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0187696014626 0.0609392437508 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.23 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.