Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of personal development as a base for professional development and advancing in one’s career and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of individual career is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am tremendously inclined to believe that the self-motivation can be a plus, and I will analyse that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, personal disciplines can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of respect to others as well as the enhanced knowledge, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the practical skills. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the career analysis and the one’s communication ability apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, personal attitude might increase the consequences of leading society in the wrong way. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of the wrong attitude could relate to this reality that the demerits of dangerous attitude pertain to kill someone’s life. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious college has asserted that the downside of the horrible communication is correlated negatively with the performance ratings. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the professional career.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of personal development far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the good nature prove the significance of professional growth, but also pinpoint social implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-17 | Ekta shah | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | Nainajovitta | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | Nainajovitta | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | Sidra018 | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | sajid.uett | 77 | view |
- Violence portrayed on TV and in the movies leads to an increase in crime in our society. People who watch violent movies are more likely to become criminals. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- It is important to maintain the balance between work and other aspects of one’s life such as family and leisure activities. Please give your opinion about how important to maintain balance and why some people think it is hard to do? 85
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards, what are the positive and negative impact on life and work. 88
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss. 85
- should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner to improve the networks of public transport? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70758122744 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35707463189 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624548736462 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4204543635 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.75 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250225872933 0.242375264174 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799722064517 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122476608577 0.071462118173 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13463955398 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0861328610279 0.0609392437508 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.