Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The phenomenon of private development and personal growth and its corresponding has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of growth in career and professional growth is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that personal growth can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, private development can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of positive feeling, as well as satisfaction and lifelong ambition, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the effects of personal learned experience and activities on professional life. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both lifelong friends and lifelong relationships apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, personal growth might increase the consequences of the efficiency of the job. Moreover, fundamental aspects of positive feeling about the job and private life could relate to this reality that the demerits of meager living pertain to the image of my/your self. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of lack of positive image from my/your self are correlated negatively with career improvement. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of mental health and satisfaction.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of personal development far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of professional growth prove the significance of happiness, but also pinpoint lifelong performance implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-17 | Ekta shah | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | Nainajovitta | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | Nainajovitta | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | Sidra018 | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | sajid.uett | 77 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6524822695 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24209678911 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599290780142 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.442446901 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.833333333 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129715349848 0.242375264174 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462636866761 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379800820766 0.071462118173 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0819087430859 0.151781067708 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038783021229 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.