One of the most conspicuous trend of today's world is the colossal upsurge of mass media through technology information. However, there are both negative and positive effects for mass media through information technology. The following paragraphs, will focus on explaining the merits and demerits of this notion.
There are a myriad of positive effect for technology information through mass media. The most preponderant one is that it enables one to share and receive news from any part of the world with a single touch on the screen. People can know what is happening around their country. Governments can also use this for several goods. For example, establishing this system will help them to inform people in disaster situations like tsunami, earthquake, and so on.
Another pivotal aspect is that it also has some negative effects. It can spread fake news, which is one of the prevalent issue that is occurring nowadays as most users tend to quickly believe the information that is fed to them and to create panic among citizens. For example, sharing unchecked news in the time of a plague, pandemic or a flood can make situation become worse.
In view of the arguments mentioned above, one can conclude the negative and positive of mass media through information technology. In my opinion, despite some drawbacks, the benefits of this advanced system is to great to ignore.
- Positive and negative effects of the information revolution through mass media 55
- Positive and negative effects of the information revolution through mass media 55
- University only requires to apply digital media rather than continuously upgrading textbook Agree or disagree 67
- The belching and unauthorized behavior is unacceptable in modern offices How far you support this view Give your response with justification 68
- Normal societal roles for women include taking care of the children in the household But now that women contribute equally in outdoor responsibilities it would be a little unfair to expect the same amount of dedication towards the upbringing of th 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...demerits of this notion. There are a myriad of positive effect for technology infor...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 211, Rule ID: TO_TOO[5]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...the benefits of this advanced system is to great to ignore.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1161.0 1207.87684729 96% => OK
No of words: 228.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09210526316 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71177155862 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 139.433497537 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574561403509 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2048356554 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3076923077 104.977214359 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5384615385 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46153846154 7.25397266985 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348598824125 0.242375264174 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145880700114 0.0925447433944 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.214589302081 0.071462118173 300% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239958763195 0.151781067708 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135248905109 0.0609392437508 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.