Positive and negative effects of today’s communication.
Recently, the importance of communication and its corresponding mediums impact has sparked an ongoing debate which inevitably leads to a moot question, has communication brought the world closer? Whereas many believe that today communication helped to achieve the highest level, however, many holds its opposite view. In this essay I will discuss both the points with related examples.
From the social standpoint, communication has transformed from telegraph to web has provided a noticeable effect in the society which are rooted in the fact that global connections and information distribution are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student I performed an experiment which discovered that due to mobile and internet business has expanded to every corner of world, video calling and text messages has eradicate the distances. Thus, beneficial ramification of advancement in media can be seen.
Within the realm of science, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that communication medium such as mobile, internet, WiFi etc has made people less interactive. Mobile phone distracting one to focus on their goals. Moreover, fundamental aspects of this issue is that people are less socialise physically. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university asserted that excess use of mobile phone can lead one to depression, mental sickness and losses thinking power. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of increasing communication systems can be a threat for the society.
To conclude, there is several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of communication far outweighs its drawbacks. Not only this helping one to connect with each other but also allowing to learn everyday.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-03 | topraveesh | 88 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | mohammadsabet | 77 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | woutan | 88 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | woutan | 77 | view |
| 2022-04-08 | amolsharma44 | 80 | view |
- IN SOME COUNTRIES TEENAGERS ARE ENCOURAGED TO DO PART TIME JOBS BY SOME PEOPLE OTHERS DISAGREE DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OPINION 84
- Technological innovations have affected our lives. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- You recently did a short cookery course The cookery school has asked for your feedback on this course Write a letter to the course director at the cookery school In your letter describe what you enjoyed about the course say how much cooking you ve done si 81
- Positive and negative effects of today’s communication. 11
- Stress is now a major problem in many countries around the world. What are some of the factors in modern society that cause this stress, and how can we reduce it? 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 411, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun other seems to be countable; consider using: 'many others'.
Suggestion: many others
...l, video calling made people closer and many other. Thus, beneficial ramification of advan...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 222, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'learning'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: learning
...nnect with each other but also allowing to learn everyday.
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 231, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...h each other but also allowing to learn everyday.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33962264151 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04497204463 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62641509434 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8703857155 50.4703680194 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.916666667 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08333333333 7.25397266985 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.025851968241 0.242375264174 11% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00886248878454 0.0925447433944 10% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.019828054696 0.071462118173 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0145810934121 0.151781067708 10% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0146055515855 0.0609392437508 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.