“The information revolution by modern mass communication has both positive and negative consequences for individuals and for society.” To what extent do you agree? Explain with your own experience.
Recently, information revolutions have sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "is it advantageous or not?". Whereas it is a widely held view that modern mass communications are highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the modern mass communications standpoint, negative consequences are bound up inextricably with positive consequences, which indicates they lead to both individual effects and modern societies. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between information systems and communication media as well as an exponential increase in advanced societies. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of individual effects is correlated positively with not only modern mass communications but also information revolutions.
Within the realm of modern mass communications, without the slightest doubt, negative consequences attribute to positive consequences, in that they would come down to individual effects, modern societies, and information systems. A salient example of such attribution is communication media, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take advanced societies for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint modern societies' problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of information revolutions.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that the advantages of information revolutions are of more significance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-03 | topraveesh | 88 | view |
| 2020-08-21 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2020-06-27 | Janabakhshi | 85 | view |
| 2020-03-25 | Cheyi1127 | 81 | view |
- It is harder for children growing up in the 21st century than it was in the past How far do you agree with this statement Give your opinions 85
- Unemployment among young people is a serious problem One solution has been suggested is to shorten the working week What do you think are the advantages and disadvantages Do you think this policy should apply to just young workers or the whole workforce 85
- The information revolution by modern mass communication has both positive and negative consequences for individuals and for society To what extent do you agree Explain with your own experience 88
- What can make learning a new foreign language unimportant Give your example and explanation 88
- As cities expanding some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population What s your opinion Give some examples or experien 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 22, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'communications'' or 'communication's'?
Suggestion: communications'; communication's
...hout this essay. From the modern mass communications standpoint, negative consequences are b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 248.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 6.08870967742 5.00649968141 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.5248024867 2.71678728327 130% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637096774194 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5818896298 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.0 104.977214359 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349226257317 0.242375264174 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119393106316 0.0925447433944 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733636275282 0.071462118173 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181737949765 0.151781067708 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068798640157 0.0609392437508 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 12.6369458128 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 53.1260098522 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.34 11.5310837438 159% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.94827586207 181% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.