PTE essay:People pursue dangerous activities like skydiving, motorcycle sports, white-water river rafting etc. Do you support? If yes, why and if not, why?

One of the most conspicuous trends in today's world is the fact that large shopping malls are replacing small local shops in cities and towns. There is a widespread worry that will cause a myriad of problems. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.

There are quite a number of reasons in support of my stance. The most preponderant one is that the local shops will get customers and business from the local people. It is not only an easy way for local customers to buy from the nearby small shops but also they can comfortably save some money without travelling till the large shops. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of people's lives, with much ease.

Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned proposition is that the large shopping malls have all the necessary items and commodities available at one place. So, some people strongly argue that having to go to large shopping malls to buy the household items is the best way to get the work done. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favour of large shopping malls.

In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that there is no much harm in large shopping malls replacing small local shops in cities and towns. This should be a welcome gesture by all people for the betterment of people's lives.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 73, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...d above, one can conclude that there is no much harm in large shopping malls repla...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1188.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.640625 5.00649968141 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42041286509 2.71678728327 89% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52734375 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 374.4 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9389691753 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.41666666667 7.25397266985 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0622878697498 0.242375264174 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0306249828863 0.0925447433944 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412777284565 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0435532475886 0.151781067708 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0185798706801 0.0609392437508 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 12.6369458128 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.5310837438 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.32886699507 92% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 55.0591133005 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.