In the past decades, we have seen several classic works of literature, being converted into movies. While many people believe that turning a literature work into the film is a great idea, some think otherwise. According to them, translating classic literature work into movies destroy its originality and credibility. In my opinion, literature works can get translated into the screens effectively, and in this essay, we will discuss the same.
The main challenge that filmmakers face while turning classic works into movies is its imaginary world. Generally, the perception of the book's imaginary world varies with readers. And it's quite challenging to put all these different perceptions in one frame. But today's modern technology has made this challenge achievable. For instance, filmmakers were successfully able to adapt to the Harry Potter book franchise for a movie using VFX technology. Most of the viewers found Harry potter movies so visually appealing that their perception of the harry potter world changed. Hence, using technology literature work can be translated into a film.
Also, while making a film, the main focus of makers always remains on the main plotline and characters. But for movies based on literature work, this problem is not there as these movies carry the same plotline as the novel. For example, Harry Potter movies have the same base plotline as it is present in the books. Therefore, directors do not have to spend much time and imagination on the plot of the movie, which makes the adaptation quite easy.
Based on the above arguments, I concede that it is very much possible to make a beautiful movie based on classic literature work using modern technologies and a writer's imagination.
- A recent trend in the entertainment world is to adapt classic works of literature for either TV or the movies One argument is that this is to everyone s benefits as it introduces people to works they might otherwise never have experienced while othe 86
- Nowadays, the mass media including TV, radio and newspaper have become the essential part of our lives. What is your opinion? 56
- It is usually foolish to get married before completing your studies and getting established in a good job? Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Polygamy has increased widely in recent years. What solutions can you brought forward to decrease this issue. 55
- Sports and games create disturbance in students’ life because students cannot fully concentrate on their studies. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'putting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: putting
...with readers. And its quite challenging to put all these different perceptions in one ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 544, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ally appealing that their perception of the harry potter world changed. Hence, using tech...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...film. Also, while making a film, the main focus of makers always remains on the main pl...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 162, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...re work using modern technologies and a writers imagination.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19285714286 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74623118369 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557142857143 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.1111076801 50.4703680194 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.875 104.977214359 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.25397266985 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276550388968 0.242375264174 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953573754737 0.0925447433944 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548325118879 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166291841929 0.151781067708 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358752487794 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.