Right amount of motivation and practice can train better than classroom training. What is your opinion? Provide relevant examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of training by adequate motivation or practice and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of attending in the classroom is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that having rational motivation for training can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, strong motivation can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of frequent practice, as well as devoted effort, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of having the strong incentive on cognitive skills and theoretical knowledge. Thus, beneficial ramification of both abundant talent and having stimulating idea apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of continues practice, enough motivation might increase the consequence of intellectual ability. Moreover, fundamental aspects of hardworking endlessly would relate to this reality that the demerits of lack of teamwork ability pertain to lack of social relationship. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of studying vigorously without training in the classroom is correlated negatively with failing in the exam. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of having the source of inspiration.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of adequate motivation and constant practice for training outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of mental simulation prove the significance of performing well in the exam, but also pinpoint practical implications.
- Modern innovations of antibiotic, computer and airplane, which one is the most important and why? 85
- Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree? 11
- If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose? . 11
- Some effective people like repetitive routine such as eating the same food, do you like this way? Discuss your views. 77
- Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease? Pros & Cons?s 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71379310345 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21556300236 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627586206897 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6700092033 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.083333333 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1563923992 0.242375264174 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506979629118 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408038368766 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0894056702085 0.151781067708 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349523332152 0.0609392437508 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.98 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 55.0591133005 205% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.