Recently, the phenomenon of motivation and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that practice highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the classroom training can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the traditional education systems standpoint, stimulation can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that saying positive in every phase, as well as achieving goals, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered 80 percent attaining goals. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both better training and social training can be seen.
Within the realm of bringing out the best, failing miserably might increase the consequences of a sense of accomplishment. Moreover, fundamental aspects of a sense of failure related to this reality that the demerits of team working pertain to a good team player. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of internal communications is correlated negatively with regular practice. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of hard working.
To conclude, while three are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of being diligent far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of being consistent prove the significance of impressive accomplishment, but also pinpoints of a phenomenon success implications.
- benefits and problems of studying and performing the old play in high school. 85
- mass media 85
- The illiterates of the 21 st century are not those who can not read and write, but those who cannot learn - Alvin Toffler. explain the statement and do you agree or disagree. 11
- do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not? what is the reason for that? 11
- the environmental we live in is in danger.what are the underlying causes?who is responsible to combat this? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 206, Rule ID: PROVE_PROOF[2]
Message: Did you mean 'proof' (noun) instead of prove (verb)?
Suggestion: proof
...y do the advantages of being consistent prove the significance of impressive accompli...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65490196078 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3250092142 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670588235294 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8993492569 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.166666667 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107070858814 0.242375264174 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0346030250289 0.0925447433944 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527682393251 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0557026203837 0.151781067708 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557756360361 0.0609392437508 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.