Climate change has been a major and global phenomenon that sparks heated debates and conflicts among societies, organizations, and individuals. One proponent believes that everyone including private and public institutions like governments, companies, and individuals have equal responsibilities over caring for mother nature. This essay will discuss why it is crucial to encourage everyone especially the government and companies to provide solutions to the widespread issue of climate change.
Firstly, large institutions and organizations such as governments and companies have a huge responsibility in mitigating the effects of climate change. Private companies have the resources and capacity to mobilize programs and campaigns to reach a greater audience. A perfect example is the support that Coca-Cola provides to World Wildlife Foundation. Without the support of these private companies, organizations that combat climate change in the forefront will lose funding they need to survive. Thus, I believe governments and companies have an unimaginably positive effect on the fight against climate change.
Secondly, individuals also play a pivotal role in resolving climate change once and for all. If individuals will be more prudent and careful of their own carbon footprint, we slow down or even stop the effects of climate change. A widely known example is the campaign to plant trees in Chicago by graduating students from high school. This would create a snowball effect in mitigating the risks of climate change to the stratosphere.
In conclusion, governments, companies, and individuals all have an essential part to play in battling against climate change. I suggest that we should take all efforts and initiatives into more serious and elevated consideration.
- Life experience is better than books or formal education? Agree or disagree? 77
- More and more students are choosing to study at colleges and universities in a foreign country. Do the benefits of studying abroad outweigh the drawbacks? 85
- Some people believe laws change human behavior. Do you agree with it? 73
- In towns and cities, large shopping malls should replace the small local shop. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- Nowadays, television is an essential part of our lives, as a medium to spread news and awareness, and, for some, it even acts as a companion. What is your opinion about this? 65
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 8.36945812808 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71428571429 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13894241208 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593984962406 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.9959909666 50.4703680194 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.571428571 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307414817955 0.242375264174 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974660019941 0.0925447433944 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737034381087 0.071462118173 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169563445164 0.151781067708 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602831288623 0.0609392437508 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.