One of the conspicuous trends in today's world is the colossal upsurge of vehicles on the roads. It is believed that government should construct more roads to accommodate vehicles. As far as I am concerned, I agree with the opinion that improving the network of public transport is the only way to cope with the apprehension. This article will elaborate both sides and thus lead to a constructive conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons for building more roads. Some people believe that possessing one's vehicle is the inherent right and they eager more space. As an illustration, vehicles in Shanghai rose 1000 percent in last decade and roads increased five times correspondingly.
Nevertheless, there remain some drawbacks, which can certainly overwhelm the potential benefits, and the most dominant ones stems from the fact that increasing roads lead to more environmental degradation. On the contrary, improving public transport can not only reduce the traffic jams during peak hours but also help to control environment quality. For example, according to ABC news, the newly train route established in Singapore reduces the traffic congestion up to 10 percent in 2016. Therefore, improving public transport plays a crucial role in solving vehicle issues.
Considering all the substantial insights outlined above, we can safely reach a conclusion that building more roads only skims the surface. Instead, strengthening transportation infrastructure is the only choice.
- Medical technology can increase the humans life expectancy. Is it blessing or curse? 52
- Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport? 77
- Many university students live with their families while others live away from home because their universities are in different places. What are the advantages and disadvantages both situations? 77
- Medical technology can increase the humans life expectancy. Is it blessing or curse? 55
- Some people think the purpose of education is to prepare the future workforce and make good members of society. Others think the purpose of education should lead to self-fulfillment. What is your opinion? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 103, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ds. Some people believe that possessing ones vehicle is the inherent right and they ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1262.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 230.0 242.827586207 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48695652174 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07512736607 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660869565217 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0947122393 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0769230769 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6923076923 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37392502963 0.242375264174 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11241784344 0.0925447433944 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080186277855 0.071462118173 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202175093586 0.151781067708 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385061728714 0.0609392437508 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.