Should University penalize students for late submission of their work?
At university, students are commonly assessed through individual or group assignments. Some people think that penalty due to late submission is reasonable while others argue that it is not necessary. This essay will argue that although such punishment is strict and imposes pressure on students, it is mandatory to do so.
To begin with, due date requires students to manage their time effectively and avoid procrastination. Penalty is an effective way to gain students commitment on submitting the tasks on time. For instance, while working on multiple projects at the same time, students are self – control of their timetable. To avoid losing marks, they are more likely to plan their schedule and assign a reasonable amount of time for the task. Meeting the deadlines demonstrates students’ ability to effectively manage their time.
By exerting pressure on students, universities prepare them for future workforce and educate them to employ available resources to accomplish a given task. In fact, to assist students, most universities develop a large resource and supporting services such as workshop in writing essay, computer lab demonstration and math or statistic workshop. Furthermore, students are free to discuss with each other about the content or their professors to receive advice or clarification. Thus, there is no reason that students cannot complete their task on time.
To conclude, this essay has argued that students should receive penalties when they fail to submit their assignment on time. Such punishment increases students’ commitment on sufficiently using all available resources offered by university to carry out the given task efficiently.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-03 | yasamin62 | 85 | view |
| 2020-11-03 | yasamin62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | gupta-vikas | 55 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | gupta-vikas | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | jashan randhawa | 89 | view |
- Do you think formal written assessments in today's world to assess students’ performance is effective or not? Discuss your viewpoint on this and support your answer with examples. 77
- Universities marks deduct who students are late. Give your opinion and examples. 77
- The university will deduct the student’s score for late assignments, opinions and solutions.Or Should University penalize students for late submission of their work? 77
- Should University penalize students for late submission of their work? 77
- Universities marks deduct who students are late. Give your opinion and examples. 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, thus, while, for instance, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54651162791 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04897872373 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616279069767 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8115569359 50.4703680194 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.214285714 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.25397266985 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295852177386 0.242375264174 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964997191952 0.0925447433944 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506817849466 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158149290781 0.151781067708 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418901292322 0.0609392437508 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.