In social events, which one is better, being a good talker or a good listener?
Recently, the phenomenon of being a good talker and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that a good listener can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, In social events can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, talker In social events might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of social activities far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-29 | Behnaz fallah | 64 | view |
| 2020-09-06 | sattar_iust | 85 | view |
| 2019-08-17 | 3pid | 88 | view |
| 2019-04-30 | gude sah | 54 | view |
- Teenagers should be taught financial lessons at school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
- In a cashless society people use more credit cards What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon 80
- Having a diet or doing exercise, which one is better for a fit body? 85
- Some students focus on their academic lessons, while extracurricular activities also play an important role. Do you agree or not? 88
- Some students leave school to find jobs. What do you suggest? School leaving or university education. Why? Support your answer with examples. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6820083682 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25460621528 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673640167364 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0231971698 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.454545455 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7272727273 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182274162098 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061776236096 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724566744671 0.071462118173 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.09289194411 0.151781067708 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712259579429 0.0609392437508 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.02 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.