In social situations, some people believe that it is better to be a good listener than a good talker. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of "in social situations, some people believe that it is better to be a good listener than a good talker" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that being a good talker might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that being a good listener can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the society standpoint, being a good listener than a good talker can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that increasing the awareness of people and listening to good stories are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of listening in societies. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both listening and talking distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, being a good talker might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of self-esteem of individuals. Moreover, fundamental aspects of social situations can relate to the reality that the demerits of being a chatty person can pertain to the lack of knowledge. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of an informative speech were correlated positively with self-confidence of the spokesperson, the local authorities would ultimately address using proper words. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of training and learning.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of being a good listener than a good talker far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-29 | Behnaz fallah | 64 | view |
| 2020-09-06 | sattar_iust | 85 | view |
| 2019-04-30 | gude sah | 54 | view |
- We have entered a throw away society and fill the environment with rubbish What are the causes and what are your solutions 88
- Nowadays TV has become an essential part of life Medium to spread news awareness and for some it acts like a companion What is your opinion about this 85
- The chart below shows the different levels of post school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 84
- Exams are commonly used in most schools and universities Some people think exams should be replaced by other forms of assessment Do you agree or disagree 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53583617747 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26593876914 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576791808874 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.5085937262 50.4703680194 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.454545455 104.977214359 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6363636364 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.441482422502 0.242375264174 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154475362278 0.0925447433944 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122630399546 0.071462118173 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265320682413 0.151781067708 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107801583019 0.0609392437508 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.