Some people believe that people who read books can develop more imagination and language skills than those who prefer to watch TV. Do you agree or disagree?
The importance of developing imagination and language skills by reading books, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. TV and book depending on the uses can be beneficial or detrimental. It can be agreed that people reading books develop more skills than those who watch TV, but there are some drawbacks as well. This essay will discuss both positive and negative impacts and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons to explain how more skills are developed by reading books, but the most conspicuous one is rooted in the fact that people will develop patients in long and lengthy written materials. It can be useful to develop skills such as attention, creativity in the students. For an illustration, research in this area invariably reveals, law students are smarter and creative because they have to read long lengthy books. However, TV has big potential to become part of education in near future. Thus, it is apparently true reading books can enhance skills and build a healthy and active mind.
Nevertheless, opponents of this trend tend to believe TV develops more skills than reading books by giving people peaceful mind and entertainment. It is also a big source to live a stress-free life. For example, new research from Harvard University reveals, students who prefer to watch TV are more relaxed and peaceful. Books are boring and less informatics than TV programs. Therefore, it is obviously true that watching TV also develop various useful skills.
In view of arguments outlined above, one can conclude reading books will develop more useful and better skills than watching TV, although there are few drawbacks that need to be well handled.
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 82
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? Discuss with appropriate examples. 77
- Medical technology can increase the humans' life expectancy. Is it blessing or curse? 77
- Do you think that formal written examinations are a good way to assess knowledge at school? 88
- The means of communicating in society today has changed markedly over the last ten years, in your opinion, what are the positive and negative impacts of this change? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12367491166 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70285916937 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565371024735 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1217899362 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6666666667 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.25397266985 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.461448320896 0.242375264174 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151861315176 0.0925447433944 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147286615676 0.071462118173 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292603717856 0.151781067708 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0983117383875 0.0609392437508 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 12.6369458128 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.1260098522 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.