Recently, the phenomenon of providing theoritical knowledge by universities and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that more practical training is highly beneficial, such issue regarded as thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that practices in their courses can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to agree with more practical lessons in the university. At first, theroric lessons are useful to knowing the root of knowledge. However, theoric courses are not enoph to become an expecialist in an art. For example, the study of some knowledge such as archaeology and architectory need to peractical lessons to make students able to work.
In addition, the theories are necessary before doing practical knowledge. But it can not represent all aspects of an expertis. For instance, a recent scientific research conducted by MTN University researchers in 206 has show that a significant number of stdudies such as pilot need to low theoritical courses and many houers flying to become an experienced and reliable plot.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this statement, I profoundly believe that despite the importance of theoric knowledge, practical courses are more benefitial to become more experienced and have less drawbacks than theories.
- With the right amount of motivation and practice, people can learn anything that the experts teach in the classroom. Do you agree or disagree? 85
- Most people in what are known as the developed nations have homes full of gadgets and labor-saving devices, from vacuum cleaners and dishwashers to the latest in computer technology. Some people claim that despite all these labor-saving devices, we seem t 56
- Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss. 77
- Some types of employment are more suitable for men and other types of employment are more appropriate for women.'To what extent do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons andexamples from your own experience. 55
- studying works of literatures of a hundred years ago is a waste of time for students today. Agree or disagree. Give yous reason and example. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of providing th...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lessons to make students able to work. In addition, the theories are necessary ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 362, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y houers flying to become an experienced and reliable plot. In conclusion, ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ome an experienced and reliable plot. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 230, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun drawbacks is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ial to become more experienced and have less drawbacks than theories.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1224.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 224.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46428571429 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11471521858 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620535714286 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7571149518 50.4703680194 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.272727273 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2727272727 7.25397266985 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 2.91625615764 240% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189400982592 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636325593394 0.0925447433944 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474875891477 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107045033489 0.151781067708 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552631650038 0.0609392437508 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.