Some people claim that public transport should be free of charge, while other disagrees. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Good public transportation is essential in metropolitan cities for people to commute easily. There are people who believe that public transport should be free for public while others are of other view. This essay will elaborate both point of views.
On one hand, free public transport will be a huge relieve for poor people. With ease of commutation from one place to another they will have more opportunities to work and earn money without being worried of finances for travelling. For instance, maids working in residential areas in morning time can go to commercial areas in evening to earn more money with free transportation system. Hence free travelling creates more opportunities for under privileged people.
On the other hand, free public transportation system puts a huge burden on government. This burden is because public transportation has to be subsidised so that it can be free for people. This forces governments to allocate less funds for other matters. For example, in Pakistan there was a huge cut in development funds as metro of Lahore was open for public and government decided to subsidise its fare. Therefore, other people related to development were affected.
In conclusion, subsidised public transportation can provide more opportunities for people but on other side it burdens the government. In my opinion, looking at a larger picture subsidised public transportation is beneficial for common people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-24 | Nkhatri | 55 | view |
| 2019-07-17 | Gohar Khan | 72 | view |
| 2018-08-01 | Maneli N | 88 | view |
| 2018-08-01 | Maneli N | 84 | view |
| 2018-07-29 | Mani.Narimani | 88 | view |
- Some people point that experiential learning (i.e. learning by doing it) can work well in formal education. However, others think the traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experiential learning can work well in high schools or colleges? 61
- Effective learning requires time comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment Study and employment distract one from another To what extent do you think the statements are realistic Support your opinion with examples 55
- The disadvantages of tourism in less developed countries are as great as the advantages What is your opinion 72
- Some people point that experiential learning i e learning by doing it can work well in formal education However others think a traditional form of teaching is the best Do you think experiential learning can work well in high schools or colleges 94
- Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. Which opinion do you agree with? Discuss both options and give examples. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 389, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... money with free transportation system. Hence free travelling creates more opportunit...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun funds is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...le. This forces governments to allocate less funds for other matters. For example, i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, look, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1212.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 227.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33920704846 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05773206762 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 139.433497537 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550660792952 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 383.4 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0152299226 50.4703680194 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5714285714 104.977214359 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2142857143 20.9669160288 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274285562801 0.242375264174 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121940960519 0.0925447433944 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10998809761 0.071462118173 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205009973914 0.151781067708 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101639644691 0.0609392437508 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.1260098522 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 55.0591133005 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.