Some people feel that boarding schools (where students or pupils live at school during the term) are an excellent option for children, while other people disagree for a number of reasons. consider both sides of this debate and conclude.
Nowadays, with the advent of technologies, there are various entertainment facilities available around us. It is possible that children might easily get distracted from their academics. This is the reason for the increasing trend for boarding schools these days. Although many people claim that it serves as the best choice for students, sceptics are not seeing this as a positive sign. Both views will be analysed before arriving to a conclusion.
On one hand, proponents argue that staying in schools supports the students in their learning process. For instance, students who stay in hostels will study together and it is easy for them to clarify their queries. In fact, they can share their ideas on different disciplines and expand their horizons. In addition, this approach saves a lot of time spent during the travel from home to school and vice versa. Consequently, they can spend their valuable time on other extra curricular activities. Apart from this, independent living appreciates the self confidence of students.
On the other hand, opponents believe that these types of academic approaches might put their personal lives in jeopardy. In fact, young adults get lesser time to spend with their family members and other close friends. For example, a student who stays in hostel rarely gets a chance to visit their parents and neighbourhood friends. This may hurt the personal emotions and feelings of the young aspirants. Consequently, it impacts their personal well-being.
To conclude, even though boarding schools have various positive aspects, it is not seen as the optimum way for learning as it impacts the private lives of the students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-04 | Carol Yuen | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-10 | arami | 80 | view |
| 2018-11-03 | deepak4388 | 88 | view |
| 2018-07-18 | SB83 | 70 | view |
| 2018-07-10 | Manjeet Sidhu | 55 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...not seeing this as a positive sign. Both views will be analysed before arriving t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, may, so, well, apart from, for example, for instance, in addition, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 20.9802955665 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26315789474 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69317808704 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597744360902 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8502189201 50.4703680194 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.3529411765 104.977214359 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6470588235 20.9669160288 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52941176471 7.25397266985 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225263291538 0.242375264174 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689756491414 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629071826032 0.071462118173 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144267571892 0.151781067708 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042798608041 0.0609392437508 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.1260098522 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.9458128079 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 61.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.