Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
The daily routine life and attempt to change it has become a controversial issue among the public all around the world. Although having the same days has some benefits and regarded by a considerable number of inhabitants as thoroughly both constructive and positive, others hold opponents view. I am inclined to profoundly believe that changing in the routines is beneficial as it could develop brilliant aspects for its adherents.
There are several reasons why altering in daily routines is advantageous. First and foremost, by changing the style of living, settlers can decline their daily stress. From my own experience, when I was a postgraduate student, I was forced to study hard without any entertainment, and after some weeks I had distgusting feeling in myself and it made me isolated, but I decided to increase my communications and go out with my friends in order to get away from any stress and difficult circumstances. Furthermore, this altering is quite beneficial for people who have the sedentary lifestyle.
On the one hand, there s no doubt this changing might have some demerits as well. For instance, if everyone does not able to adapt themselves to new conditions, they will into some troubles including some confrontations among families.
In conclusion, while altering the style of living has some demerits, I strongly believe that its advantages outweigh the drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-01-07 | bashirheidari | 44 | view |
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 80
- Some people believe law changes human behaviour. Do you agree/disagree? 77
- With the increase of digital media available online, the role of the library has become obsolete. Universitiesshould only procure digital materials rather than constantly updating textbooks. Discuss both the advantagesand disadvantages of this position an 77
- With the available information online, the role of a library is becoming obsolete, keeping books, universities, procure new digital media, updating textbooks, advantages & disadvantages 80
- Employers should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, so, well, while, as for, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1179.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 225.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09132118465 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 379.143842365 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.3383487333 50.4703680194 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.9 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1 7.25397266985 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120042162795 0.242375264174 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441121424027 0.0925447433944 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.026654360411 0.071462118173 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0687061858162 0.151781067708 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0144931835634 0.0609392437508 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.