Some people say that computers have made life easier and more convenient. Other people say that computers have made life more complex and stressful. What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of using computer systems and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of making life more convenient is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that making life easier can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, making life easier can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of computer games, as well as computer addiction, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the advantages of making life more convenient. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both making life more professional and making daily life more sociable apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of society, making life more complex might increase the consequences of being addicted to computer systems. Moreover, fundamental aspects of using laptops could relate to this reality that the demerits of a stressful life pertain to complex life. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of computer system developments is correlated negatively with not using a personal computer. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of making life more stressful.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of making life more convenient far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of using computer systems prove the significance of online computer systems, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53597122302 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07779378031 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597122302158 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3308366996 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.25 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291233295788 0.242375264174 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11372655905 0.0925447433944 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388733237593 0.071462118173 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182251999426 0.151781067708 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437452234131 0.0609392437508 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.