The sight of high numbers of cars on road is not rare these days and number of car seems increasing day by day. Many people argue that one family should have only one car and alternate form of transportation should be promoted. In the essay, I will support aforementioned statements with examples.
Firstly, rising pollution level and deteriorating air quality is normal these days. Since the advent of car, people tend to prefer it as private vehicle because it provides mobility and convenience. But it has contributed to pollution and traffic congestion. Carbon footprint is on rise and reducing vehicles on road is the right step in the direction of controlling pollution. By restricting a family to one car, carbon emission can be controlled and it can also reduce the congestion on road which will save fuels. For example, to curb the pollution car owners were allowed to take their car out of certain days. Therefore, by implementing this rule not only environment will be protected, but strain on fossil fuels will be reduced.
Secondly, since car provides sense of security and easy mobility people tend to prefer cars. If people are given option of a good alternate mode of transportation which could provide them all facilities in less money, they will definitely opt for it. By encouraging cycle, health can also be improved. In developing countries like Singapore where public transport affordable and available encourages people not to use car.
In conclusion, in the essay I analyzed why it is the need of the hour to have only one car in one family and to encourage other mode of transportation. It is in the favor of society and pristine environment in which we all live in.
- Internet or media is bad for young people because they make the young generation poor incommunication and forming relationships. Do you agree with this opinion? Please use examples or your personal experience to support your idea. 77
- Education is the single most important factor in the development of a country. Do you agree? 88
- Is it better to be a good listener or good talker? 88
- Some people suggest that each family should only have one car and encourage alternative vehicle. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 62
- Does the advent of internet change the role of the teacher To what extent do you agree 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92682926829 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89611392572 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578397212544 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.65517241379 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1785701078 50.4703680194 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.375 104.977214359 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 7.25397266985 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238969187606 0.242375264174 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734922842128 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094379995503 0.071462118173 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16041621952 0.151781067708 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551739980144 0.0609392437508 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 12.6369458128 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.5310837438 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.