In today's hectic life, employment proves to be playing a focal role in a person's life and helps him financially secure and also to get desire needs. However, many people argue that occupation should be divide based on gender while the proponents want employment to be impartial. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view after analysing both sides of the argument.
One the one hand, both men, and women are competing for each other. Firstly, a majority of the lucrative sectors are having high profiled women CEOs and these sectors are continuing to grow vigorously even during hard times. Moreover, the job market and the organisation of developed countries requires both the genders to work together to get the maximum performance from them. For instance, according to recent research by Delhi University, students in the mechanical and the automobile department are developing more determination and have the creative mindset when working together with the opposite gender. Therefore, for the success of any job market or industry, both men and women should be treated equally.
On the other hand, few of the developing countries still have male chauvinism. Additionally, women in these countries are restricted to perform those jobs which are meant to men. To illustrate, in India, a female is not allowed to pursue a career if it relates to operating machinery, and be a tourist guide. Thus, in few countries regardless of whether a woman is ready for certain occupation, the country, and the society will not allow her in any chance because of their sex discrimination.
To recapitulate, certain occupation happens to be gender biased in countries where there are socio-economic problems and in a successful country there is no such discrimination. In my opinion, any occupation should be open to everyone irrespective of gender and the decision should be left to the individual to pursue the career of their choice.
- Some types of employment are more suitable for men and other types of employment are more appropriate for women.'To what extent do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience. 80
- Some types of employment are more suitable for men and other types of employment are more appropriate for women.'To what extent do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience. 80
- Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss 55
- Some people think that animals should be kept in zoos. While others think the forest are the best for them. Discuss and give your opinion? 60
- Schools should prepare students for university. rather than for work,' How far do you agree with this statement~ Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... proves to be playing a focal role in a persons life and helps him financially secure a...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'divided'?
Suggestion: divided
... people argue that occupation should be divide based on gender while the proponents wa...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 31.9359605911 150% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 316.0 242.827586207 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13607594937 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94676332886 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588607594937 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.65517241379 246% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4772929913 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.928571429 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.25397266985 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119726799401 0.242375264174 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421399617284 0.0925447433944 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373614709812 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0640181317111 0.151781067708 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480812253406 0.0609392437508 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.