Some universities deduct students’ scores or penalize them for late submission of assignments. What is your opinion about it and what are the possible solutions.
Ample of universities nowadays have adopted the method of giving students less scores or punishing them for late deliverance of assignments. Whether it is a judicious step or not has become a moot point of discussion. However, I am inclined towards the fact deducting students marks will make pupils more diligent and attentive towards their project but sometimes it could be problematic for weak ones and students with genuine reasons.
To commence, there is no ambiguity to say that, fear of punishment for late submission of projects does not let learners get indolent, and keeps them focused towards their goal. Evidently, students also learn discipline and time management which will be of utmost value for them in their future endeavors. As an illustration, pupils working in the distinct fields such as IT, engineering, medical and journalism etcetera will always finish their task in the given time frame as they would have learned the paramount value of time in university. Hence, fear of deduction in marks makes students perform better.
Although there should some alternatives or exceptions for the learners with genuine reasons and weak students. Teachers should provide extra time to the students who have authentic reasons such as family issues, health problems and lack of resources etcetera. For instance, sometimes a family member of a student may fall prey to a deadly disease for which one has to be hospitalized, therefore it gets extremely difficult for the student to give full concentration on project as he has to take care of his beloved one simultaneously. Hence, leniency should be showed among them, and also proper guidance should be delivered to weak students through books and material.
Succinctly, deduction of students late submission of project is justifiable in case of careless pupils, but not for the genuine and vulnerable ones.
- The important effect of successful sports stars and glamours film are role model for youngster, which Successful sports stars and glamours film are role model for youngster. Do you sported or not? 77
- The claim that animals have rights has been subjected as a matter of debate since the 1970’s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned? 80
- some people believe laws change human behavior. do you agree it. 22
- In a cashless society, people use more credits cards. What are the advantanges and disadvantages of this phenomenon 79
- Fast food has become a part of our society . what is the impact of fast food on human health? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 438, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ones and students with genuine reasons. To commence, there is no ambiguity to sa...
^^^
Line 2, column 210, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to discipline'
Suggestion: to discipline
...ir goal. Evidently, students also learn discipline and time management which will be of ut...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 480, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to give full concentration on project as he has to take care of his beloved one s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, as to, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85159604432 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586666666667 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.4393061031 50.4703680194 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.5 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210550289831 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842850438734 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653664491704 0.071462118173 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14508996175 0.151781067708 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357253489218 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.