Space travel is fantastic these days, but there are many issues, such as environmental problems, that we should be focusing on. What are your views on the allocation of public funding?
In the contemporary era, the advancements of technology played an indispensable role in the space travel, which has caused many environmental issues and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although, some people contest that instead of spending money on space travel it should be spend on issues like environmental problems, other disagree with this proposition. This essay will discuss that instead of spending money on space travel it should be spend on serious issues of the world.
Firstly, space travel has no such benefit to the people of the world because there is nothing in the space that can benefit the people of the world. Moreover, there is no information in my knowledge that tell us that the astronauts brought some valuable items from the space or any other information from the space has given any benefit to us. As a tangible instance, even landing on the moon we cannot get any benefits from the details we got from there. Manifestly, the space travel is nothing but a waste of money.
Secondly, the impact of environmental problems has adverse effects on the world and its repercussions are known to every human being. Furthermore, greenhouse gasses and other pollutants are increasing day by day, which are creating global warming and result in the spreading of many diseases. To cite a practical example, In a recent study, it was revealed that those people who are living near industrial area have more health problems as compared to other people. Evidently, there are more critical issues in the world which requires special attention than space travel.
In conclusion, this essay discussed that space travel has no significant benefits for human beings. Therefore, I staunchly opine that government should allocate public funding on serious issues of the world not on the space travel.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-02 | angelstrack | 88 | view |
| 2019-07-04 | 6tttcj | 85 | view |
| 2019-06-15 | farhadkhan56295 | 77 | view |
| 2019-06-15 | farhadkhan56295 | 77 | view |
- The claim that animals have rights has been subjected as a matter of debate since the 1970’s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned? 77
- Team sports are generally promoted as a great way to keep fit and build character. However, sporting events such as soccer matches are often accompanied by violence between rival supporters and other forms of antisocial behaviour. If sporting events cause 77
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion on this? Do you think this is a good or bad change? 72
- Space travel is fantastic these days, but there are many issues, such as environmental problems, that we should be focusing on. What are your views on the allocation of public funding? 77
- Working employees have paid leaves Is it good or bad 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 299, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spent'?
Suggestion: spent
...ding money on space travel it should be spend on issues like environmental problems, ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 466, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spent'?
Suggestion: spent
...ding money on space travel it should be spend on serious issues of the world. Firs...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75060397408 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.9 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4649121365 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.615384615 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21996358357 0.242375264174 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848266778067 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586534765073 0.071462118173 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13744714457 0.151781067708 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582707061605 0.0609392437508 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.