sport events
Although such topics, in all likelihood, will never yield a consensual agreement, a constructive dialogue on hosting sporting events such as the Olympics and its related vital aspect can lead to thought-provoking discussion. My view is irrespective of the numerous arguments which were exited on either side, such events have dramatic positive points as per the following illustration.
To commence with, sports events can help to create more job opportunities and it will develop locals’ financial capacities. Moreover, it is crucial to consider that as soon as these events conduct in a country, more people will find substantial jobs. For instance, as per a recent study which was published recently, two of four of British citizens get jobs during the World cup games which conducted in England. Therefore, the aforementioned discussion shows that authorities should launch awareness campaigns to enhance their nations’ knowledge about sports events positive points.
Additionally, there are numerous aspects which were associated with sports events. Also, it could be noticed then when people travel abroad to attend these events, their interpersonal skills will be boosted. Consequently, it exemplifies that local authorities should shed more light on the privileges of these sports events.
In conclusion, after I manifested the above notions, it might be highlighted that there is equally potential evidence to support my view, and hence my opinion is that sports occasions have various positive points for citizens and individuals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-12 | aymanwahab | 88 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1328.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 234.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67521367521 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09768635428 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653846153846 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.071859959 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.8 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.25397266985 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316951289333 0.242375264174 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124019673018 0.0925447433944 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837222965765 0.071462118173 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170581682869 0.151781067708 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767708714128 0.0609392437508 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.