young employees
Although such topics, in all likelihood, will never yield a consensual agreement, a constructive dialogue on the belief of younger employees often has more skills and knowledge than senior employees can lead to thought-provoking discussion. My view is irrespective of the numerous arguments which were exited on either side, junior employees have a more positive spirit and motivation.
First and foremost, there are numerous aspects in favor of my stance. To commence with, the young generations might be more willing to increase their earning capacity and they spent extra energy. Moreover, it is important to consider that when young people get hired in a corporate job, they could express their extra effort to show their input. For instance, as per a study which was published recently, more than half of third of British young employees has higher energy than the older one. Therefore, the aforementioned discussion shows that governments should shed more light on the above privileges for the benefit fo their nations.
Additionally, another positive point which was associated with young employees energy is that they are more desired to achieve their self-esteem. In addition, as soon as they get hired in a company, they achieve good results. Consequently, family breadwinners should draw more attention to the merit of young employees joining.
In conclusion, after I manifested the above points, it could be observed that there is equally potential evidence to support my idea, and hence my opinion is that there are various advantages from junior people hiring.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...e point which was associated with young employees energy is that they are more desired to...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, third, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1335.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 249.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36144578313 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89825197633 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610441767068 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3032444912 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.363636364 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6363636364 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.25397266985 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297573559543 0.242375264174 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112502486794 0.0925447433944 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106326646294 0.071462118173 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165321195047 0.151781067708 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10400931313 0.0609392437508 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.