stopping tobacco and related diseases by regulations
Recently, the phenomeno of tobacco and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that N is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that banning cigarettes can be a plus, and I will analyze it throughout this essay.
From the sociological standpoint, stopping most widely-used drug can provide the society with some beneficial effects which are rooted in the fact that avoiding waste of money , as well as helping our health, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a student, I performed an academic experiement which discovered enacting regulations against smoking. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both decreasing using tobacco and prohobitting this harmful drug apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of psychological science, smoking by billions of adults might increase the consequences of cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. Moreover, fundamental aspects of heart attack relate to this reality that the demerits of wide-spread smokin pertain to being legal by government. As a tangible example, scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the lung cancer is correlated negatively with smokers. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of oral problems.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of legislating rules for protecting prople far outweigh its drawback. Not only do the advantages of stoping smoker citizens prove the significance of detrimental effects, but also pinpoint the decision of smoking implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-02-17 | amin_mostafavi | 88 | view |
- Study a Particular Area of Climate Change: global warming or environmental problems 88
- Tourism in Undeveloped Countries 88
- Should age discrimination against older workers be made illegal? 55
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in future. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- Should age discrimination against older workers be made illegal? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 176, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...in the fact that avoiding waste of money , as well as helping our health, are inex...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70114942529 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29335130392 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.708812260536 0.580463131201 122% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9630592391 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0986723897271 0.242375264174 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0257595292454 0.0925447433944 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.031391159887 0.071462118173 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0428472266829 0.151781067708 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351819842644 0.0609392437508 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.39 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 55.0591133005 202% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.