Animals have "rights". Are zoos helping or hurting our animals?
Recently, the phenomenon of animals' right and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that zoo and parks is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that exhibitions can be a plus, and I will analyze it throughout this essay.
From the sociological standpoint, freedom can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that wild life, as well as animals in captivity, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment which discovered behaving differently. Thus, beneficial ramifications of animals in cages apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of psychological science, dangerous specious might increase the consequences of hurting people. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of wild animals like lion, tiger and wolf relate to this reality that the demerits of hunting pertain to animals' instinction. As a tangible example, scientific research undertaken by aprestigious university has asserted that the downside of the attacking people is correlated negatively with eating food. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of wild life.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both side, I profoundly believe that the benefits of animals' captivity far outweigh its drawback. Not only do the advantages of teaching to children prove the significance of it, but also pinpoint learning useful facts about their life implications.
- illegally age discrimination in workplaces 88
- Money Spent on Space Exploration 77
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in future. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- Effects of Regions on an Accomplished Person 85
- Animals have "rights". Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 242.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59504132231 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18396407192 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.694214876033 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2462119473 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.833333333 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159585861755 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503436719406 0.0925447433944 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05342399139 0.071462118173 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0843035767435 0.151781067708 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210521987497 0.0609392437508 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.