For a successful company, selling products depends more on company's reputation or it depends more on if they provide discount and free offers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of how companies are selling their products and its profound impact has become a long-running dispute among the public. Although it is a widespread belief that company's reputation is intrinsically rewarding, a fair number of academic researchers view this from their theoretical perspective. Nonetheless, I am inclined to believe that each business should carefully weigh up the pros and cons of importance of company's reputation or providing free offers.
From a socioeconomic standpoint, lower price is intimately bound up with big sale, which it might be the deciding factor in both having potential buyers and brand recognition. For example, a prestigious university in Europe undertook a comprehensive study to demonstrate the nature of the relationship between customer value and business strategy as well as gaining market share. Therefore, the conclusive evidence presented thus far support the contention that convincing people to purchase correlates positively with not only customer service but also free offers.
In financial terms, a competitive labor market is undoubtedly attributable to the business model, in that it would lead to making a profit, economic prosperity, and increasing the market shares. A vivid illustration of such attributions is the trustworthy companies, which is the underlying cause for concern since the business leaders have overlooked in taking potential buyers for granted. Had they contemplated market segment in advance, it might have had ample opportunity to preserve the relationship with buyers. Thus, the excellent customer service could play a dominant role in making more profits.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I firmly believe that the advantages of company's reputation are of more significance. However, the local authorities are recommended to amend the existing legislation to minimize undesirable side effects of providing discounts and free offers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | khaledayasmin | 80 | view |
| 2019-04-25 | Paulo87 | 70 | view |
| 2019-01-16 | lalacamargo1 | 77 | view |
| 2018-07-14 | Rajnidevi | 80 | view |
| 2018-07-13 | SB83 | 75 | view |
- For a successful company, selling products depends more on company's reputation or it depends more on if they provide discount and free offers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
- Global Warming 89
- For a successful company, selling products depends more on company's reputation or it depends more on if they provide discount and free offers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
- For a successful company, selling products depends more on company's reputation or it depends more on if they provide discount and free offers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
- For a successful company, selling products depends more on company's reputation or it depends more on if they provide discount and free offers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ucts and its profound impact has become a long-running dispute among the public. Although it i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74149659864 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21408954518 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 139.433497537 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639455782313 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 379.143842365 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 1.56157635468 512% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.523359945 50.4703680194 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.666666667 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.25397266985 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173231987727 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570342849308 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423949151433 0.071462118173 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10256655444 0.151781067708 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562240480753 0.0609392437508 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.52 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.