Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are role models for youngsters. Do you agree with this statement?
These days there is an ongoing debate between people about following the famous celebrities. While it is possible to claim that our youngsters can learn and get motivation from glamorous people like movie stars, my view is that it can lead to the myriad of concerns for our society and young generation. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view by analysing this argument in detail.
First of all, there are several reasons why I am against the adulation of film stars by youngsters. The most preponderant one is that movie stars perform negative characters also in the movies where they portray themselves as a powerful, ruthless and above the law. Therefore, following such people can lead young brains to negativity and teenagers may fall into the bad habits because of admiration of their favourite movie stars. It should also be taken into account that most often, filmstars show a lavish lifestyle in the movies which can divert young people from their life goals.
Second of all, it has been widely seen that the sports stars openly advertise alcoholic beverages and tobacco products which can incline youngsters to try such things. Moreover, many famous sports personalities found guilty in match-fixing charges and other corruption scandals also. A recent example of the famous spot-fixing case in cricket by cricketers who were blindly followed by millions of people and it shows that they have no moral values.
In conclusion, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that it is not wise for youngsters to make glamorous persons their role models. Parents and teachers should encourage teenagers to praise those celebrities who are virtuous.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-29 | namdevjd1 | 72 | view |
| 2018-02-27 | engineer874 | 77 | view |
| 2018-02-06 | engineer874 | 77 | view |
| 2018-02-06 | engineer874 | 77 | view |
| 2018-01-25 | Ali101 | 11 | view |
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are role models for youngsters. Do you agree with this statement? 77
- Mandatory electoral voting systems function better than free choice voting systems Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement Support your point of views with reasons and examples 94
- Cheap overseas travel does more damage than goodDiscuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement. Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience.Write between 200-300 words. 80
- Nowadays TV has become an essential part of life. Medium to spread news & awareness and for some It acts like a companion. What is your opinion about this? 77
- Do you think formal written assessments in today's world to assess students’ performance is effective or not? Discuss your viewpoint on this and support your answer with examples. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: FAMOUS_CELEBRITY[1]
Message: Use simply 'celebrities'.
Suggestion: celebrities
...bate between people about following the famous celebrities. While it is possible to claim that our...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...g charges and other corruption scandals also. A recent example of the famous spot-fi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 20.9802955665 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15441176471 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6465277245 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1473750371 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.833333333 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132005870617 0.242375264174 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476575933102 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517279168615 0.071462118173 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0725049395712 0.151781067708 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00622576388332 0.0609392437508 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.1260098522 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.