Some effective people like repetitive routine, such as eating the same food, do you like this way?
These days there is an ongoing debate between people about following the same daily routine. While it is possible to claim that repetition of something can bore humans and it may not be effective in a way it should be. In my opinion, its totally depends on the nature and type of the work which we are following again and again. In this essay, I shall explain my point of my view by analyzing this argument deeply before presenting a plausible conclusion.
First of all, many people tend to follow the same routine of morning walk or evening exercise which I believe is an efficient way to keep up the momentum. Moreover, it not only reduces the risk of heart diseases and other physical illnesses but stimulate the brain also for daily activities. Therefore, it is apparent that why most of the people keenly maintain their daily schedules of exercises for years in order to sustain a healthy life style.
Second of all, it is also important to note that eating a balanced food which is as per a fixed plan can have many positive effects. This way is quite fruitful in order not only to enjoy food but to keep up the metabolism also. Furthermore, a recent study suggest that those people who eat same food after every other week found it tasty and delicious to eat.
In conclusion, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that the repetitive routine can be effective if we use it in a different way which can enable us to follow a fixed schedule. However, it totally depends on us how we utilize the time and resources as per our convenience.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-01 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2018-09-07 | pbdarab | 88 | view |
| 2018-05-30 | Pavan Konapuli | 80 | view |
| 2018-05-20 | ajayvermaETP | 85 | view |
| 2018-05-04 | masi1397 | 88 | view |
- Road rules are generally enforced by fining people for infringements. Some people, however, believe that governments should not be penalized unsafe drivers but reward safe drivers instead.Which view do you support? 77
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are role models for youngsters. Do you agree with this statement? 77
- Computer technology has had more of a negative than a positive impact on society How far do you agree with this statement? Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience. 55
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are role models for youngsters. Do you agree with this statement? 77
- Cheap overseas travel does more damage than goodDiscuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement. Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...e in a way it should be. In my opinion, its totally depends on the nature and type ...
^^^
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...njoy food but to keep up the metabolism also. Furthermore, a recent study suggest th...
^^^^
Line 7, column 118, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e routine can be effective if we use it in a different way which can enable us to follow a fixed s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e and resources as per our convenience.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 20.9802955665 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1282.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62815884477 5.00649968141 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54885918237 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584837545126 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.596130671 50.4703680194 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.833333333 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9166666667 7.25397266985 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204184963002 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686561132732 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508040272356 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11468296648 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529712848779 0.0609392437508 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 12.6369458128 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.1260098522 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.5310837438 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.