technological access to online music
The importance of technology access to online music paid which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears be more rational. This essay will further elaborate both positive and negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reason which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that provide help to struggling singers and composes, so that they learn myriad things from now technology . Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that provide individuals can also have access to music. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that they also provide motivation to the upcoming singers. Besides, it reduces market value and popularity of a composed music. Hence, it is apparent why many are against of this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of it decreases motivation of singers are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-22 | namdev190@gmail.com | 80 | view |
| 2021-10-06 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 85 | view |
| 2021-09-21 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 85 | view |
| 2020-12-09 | Alireza.r.m | 94 | view |
| 2020-11-10 | Mahdi_Farhani | 85 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 225, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... learn myriad things from now technology . Another pivotal aspect of this argument...
^^
Line 7, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...singers are indeed too great to ignore.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1188.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 229.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18777292576 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67277812606 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589519650655 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.9684839757 50.4703680194 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.25397266985 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161875720872 0.242375264174 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576312129342 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953158131139 0.071462118173 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0828903067919 0.151781067708 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651561090431 0.0609392437508 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.