Textbooks should replaced by online resources and advanced technology
There is an ongoing dispute about textbooks and whether it should be replaced by online resources and advance technology innovations. While some may claim that the online resources are more effective and time efficient for a learner, my view is that advance digital technology have also disadvantaged. This essay will discuss the assertion for both sides of the case before deducing a reasonable conclusion.
There are several reasons why online resources are more effective and time efficient for learners. One of them is that they can study lessons at home with the use of their gadgets as well as browsing on the internet. For instance, most people around the globe are more convenient to get information on the Google website by a click of a finger. Therefore, the online services are tremendously demanded on every institution that could help their students on their studies.
Those who argued that the advance technology innovations for students have a different view and it can actually be true. Firstly, for young children that using digital equipment can extremely harmful to their physical health. Like for example, the recent children generation are exposed from the radiation of laptop and the cell phone that causing ailments for some children. Thus, advance technology innovations can be disadvantageous in some ways for us to use it in an appropriate way.
Although there are strong contentious for both sides of the arguments, my view is that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. Therefore, I strongly recommend that governments must continue to educate people from the harmful and benefits of advanced technology.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 467, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an appropriate way" with adverb for "appropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...antageous in some ways for us to use it in an appropriate way. Although there are strong contentio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, firstly, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1385.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30651340996 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90611953415 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570881226054 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 18.2562301921 50.4703680194 36% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.538461538 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25975734873 0.242375264174 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957487184761 0.0925447433944 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153897317323 0.071462118173 215% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15682680097 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.157871479792 0.0609392437508 259% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.