There is no need for newspapers in modern world. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of deducting students marks by some universities and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that students exam marks can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, deducting students mark by some university can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment, which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, solving students deducting marks by some universities might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of universities policies far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this remarkable phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues" potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | manraj123 | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
- more information available online so library books useless? 88
- Traveling to study is over-rated. We have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really necessary for tertiary studies? 88
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life andwork? 88
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 80
- Business and financial organizations need to hard work to environmental challenges 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 370, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ividuals. I am inclined to believe that students exam marks can be a plus, and I will an...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 142, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example some scientific rese...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 247.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87044534413 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31105285707 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651821862348 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7200950454 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.818181818 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.00829758558305 0.242375264174 3% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00333946010171 0.0925447433944 4% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0105603000767 0.071462118173 15% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00654409639032 0.151781067708 4% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0113347074377 0.0609392437508 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 11.5310837438 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.93 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.