There is no need of newspapers in modern world. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of "there is no need of newspapers in the modern world" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that online materials might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that traditional newspapers can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the society standpoint, newspapers in the modern world can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that increasing the awareness of people and reading news are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of newspapers in the modern countries. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both promoting the literacy position and being a literate distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of climate science, without the slightest doubt, the effects of newspapers in the modern world might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of wasting papers. Moreover, fundamental aspects of cutting trees for making papers can relate to the reality that the demerits of newspapers can pertain to climate change. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of the elimination of forests were correlated positively with online newspapers and magazines, the local authorities would ultimately address preventing the abuse of papers. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of digital newspapers.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of newspapers in the modern world far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-31 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-08-14 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-05-24 | Sridarani | 69 | view |
| 2024-05-21 | Rafia Jawad | 55 | view |
| 2024-04-25 | Rafia Jawad | 55 | view |
- The chart below shows the different levels of post school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The advanced medical technology will expand human s life Do you think it is a blessing or a curse 89
- Works of literature is a waste of time for students today Do you agree and use your own experience 88
- Some schools believe that children should learn typing rather than a good handwriting How far do you agree with that Show reasons with your experience 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70671378092 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20506971454 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618374558304 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.7744868953 50.4703680194 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.818181818 104.977214359 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189132491157 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669523738201 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632533454551 0.071462118173 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1139694408 0.151781067708 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172331096778 0.0609392437508 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 12.6369458128 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.85 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.