Travelling to study is over-rated. We have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really necessary for tertiary studies?

Essay topics:

Travelling to study is over-rated. We have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really necessary for tertiary studies?

Recently, the phenomenon of Travelling to study and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that brilliant scholars can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From a general standpoint, tertiary studies can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and complicated procedures apparently can be seen.

Within the realm of a public arena, studying locally might increase the consequences of critical needs. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of traveling brilliant scholars can work well far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-18 ghazal123 85 view
2019-12-19 Alireza.r.68 88 view
2019-11-20 bradkina 77 view
2019-10-18 bradkina 72 view
2019-10-02 mndpsngh21 77 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1193.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 210.0 242.827586207 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68095238095 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19022387062 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.7 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6899231544 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.3 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 7.25397266985 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16380220064 0.242375264174 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591047133939 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722640835085 0.071462118173 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920022543047 0.151781067708 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373344936686 0.0609392437508 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.99 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.