In underdeveloped countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the opposite as well. Discuss your opinions and give examples.
Recently, tourism in less developed countries has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “is it advantageous or not?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that the tourism industry is highly beneficial
in under-developed countries, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the economic standpoint, tourist destinations are bound up inextricably with employment opportunities for local people, which indicates they lead to both creating jobs and generating income. As a well-known example, a longitudinal
the study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between tourist centres and economic growth as well as an exponential increase in tax revenues. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my
empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of financial success is correlated positively with not only holiday-makers but also foreign tourists.
Within the realm of society, without the slightest doubt, tourism attributes to exchanging cultural backgrounds, in that it would come down to cultural diversity, understanding, and global awareness. A salient example of such
attribution is traditional customs, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take a rich cultural heritage for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint social problems.
Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to moral and religious values. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of tourist attractions.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that the advantages of tourism in less developed countries are of more significance. However, with the benefit of
hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | amk79msce | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | amk79msce | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | amk79msce | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | mikeboss268 | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | gupta-vikas | 77 | view |
- More information available online so library books are useless. agree or disagree? 88
- Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. 77
- should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner to improve the networks of public transport? 85
- As a result of advances in medical care, average life expectancy is increasing for men and women. Do you think most people will see this as a positive development? What are the disadvantages of an ageing population for individuals and society? Support you 88
- Younger employees have more skills, knowledge and more motivated than older employees. To what extent do you agree or disagree, support your argument with your own experience? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 12, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes 'all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1748.0 1207.87684729 145% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86577181208 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33793280559 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 139.433497537 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677852348993 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9861560068 50.4703680194 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.857142857 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.25397266985 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 10.0 4.12807881773 242% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 6.9802955665 186% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.080216651908 0.242375264174 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0215523639963 0.0925447433944 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334548745407 0.071462118173 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0301130882866 0.151781067708 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314840588938 0.0609392437508 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.2 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 55.0591133005 223% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.94827586207 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.