University will deduct the student's score for a late assignment. Opinions and solutions.
The concept of deducting marks on the assignments which are submitted after the due date has become a debatable issue. Myriad of academics argue that penalizing students for such indisciplinary act is must whereas rest of the people believe otherwise. My viewpoints coincide with the above-mentioned statement. Both the opinion and solution have been discussed in the following essay.
There are myriad of arguments in favor of my viewpoint. The most conspicuous one is that by penalizing students for late submission would instill the discipline and seriousness in them which would play a very crucial role in achieving their long-term goals. Moreover, it would teach them one very significant principle of life that everything is valued only if completed on time and thus it would make the students realize the importance of cultivating the habit of timely completion of their work.
On the flip side, few demerits overwhelm the potential benefits of this rule. Firstly, it would prove to be demotivating and demoralizing for the hardworking students, if a reason for late submission was unavoidable. Thus, in such condition, scoring overdue work negatively is definitely unwarranted. Hence, professors must analyze the reason behind such indiscipline and take the appropriate action which does not harm the moral of the sincere students unnecessarily as the reaction of the mentor plays a major role in creating a healthy mind and attitude towards the life.
To recapitulate, it is the duty of the teacher to make the student prepare to face the harsh reality which life entails and thus cultivating discipline and seriousness towards fulfilling their responsibility on the time is must, hence penalizing at the school or university level for overdue project work is justified. However, genuine reasons should not be overlooked.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-31 | a.aghyi1989 | 88 | view |
2019-12-23 | Jasmaansingh1996 | 77 | view |
2019-08-29 | shreyanshpte | 88 | view |
2019-05-04 | bashirheidari | 88 | view |
2019-04-09 | Rish | 85 | view |
- Technological access to online music and the like should be paid or free. What do you think? 77
- How widely do you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life and experience time shortage? What problems it cause 77
- Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. To what extent do you agree? 95
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon. 77
- The belching and unauthorized behavior is unacceptable in modern offices. How far you support this view? Give your response with justification. 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, moreover, so, still, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35640138408 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06660301804 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598615916955 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 86.5584592279 50.4703680194 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.076923077 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84615384615 7.25397266985 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16200781599 0.242375264174 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470894014888 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409239194167 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915212124964 0.151781067708 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0143628349479 0.0609392437508 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.