Nowadays, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trend to see that studying films have been added as a part of the curriculum by the educational institutions, be it in an affluent or impoverished nation. This concept has become a topic of controversy among prodigies about equalizing the value of literature and films in the students’ life. My viewpoints coincide with the above-mentioned notion; favouring arguments are elaborated in this essay.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments which can be attributed in favour of learning films at school along with other academic subjects. Not only play and drama brings out the hidden characteristics like skill to demonstrate the stories live on the stage but art also fosters the creativity in the person and broaden their horizons in terms of knowledge and growth. Moreover, learning subjects which enhances the brain development keeps an individual at the preponderant position.
Another pivotal aspect which stems out from the argument is that learning literature is essential to attain the academic degree that adds golden feathers in the profile to procure the best employment opportunities. However, working on the practical subject like films along with other traditional subjects keeps the students active and live. Further, the career in the film industry is also glittering and by providing this as a subject during school time, youngsters get the option to excel in this field and have an excellent future.
To recapitulate, from the above-outlined arguments, it can be concluded that though literature is must to achieve the academic milestones to secure the promising future, learning films will contribute further towards overall development of the person. Hence, merits of learning film are too great to ignore.
- University will deduct the student's score for a late assignment. Opinions and solutions. 77
- Technological access to online music and the like should be paid or free. What do you think? 77
- Certain kinds of music promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? 80
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 85
- Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 99, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
... be concluded that though literature is must to achieve the academic milestones to secu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 31.9359605911 150% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3865248227 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0072782794 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595744680851 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.9374127974 50.4703680194 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.090909091 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 20.9669160288 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 7.25397266985 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191897776982 0.242375264174 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636728919139 0.0925447433944 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473191923788 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104363987211 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208556635125 0.0609392437508 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.