The university will deduct the students' scores for late assignments. Opinion and solutions?
Recently, the phenomenon of deduction students’ score and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of graduate students is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that students’ marks can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the university penalizing students’ mark can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of the correlation between university and student, as well as university strategies, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experience which discovered the link between penalizing and students. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both university management and university developments apparently can be seen.
Within a realm of science, issuing late assignments might increase the consequences of assignment improvements. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of postponing assignment could relate to this reality that demerits of being late in graduating pertain to assignments analysis. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted the downside of assignments facts correlated negatively with the role of assignments. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of assignments policies.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the students’ scores far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the balance between scores and students prove the significance of the interaction between students and scores, but also pinpoint students' score improvement implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-22 | aidasadr | 80 | view |
| 2019-08-03 | 3pid | 88 | view |
| 2019-07-30 | bashirheidari | 85 | view |
| 2019-04-17 | titanic-basnet | 55 | view |
| 2019-01-27 | mohseny | 88 | view |
- As E books are available online these days the value of printed books has diminished Agree or disagree 85
- Some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life Do you agree or disagree Give your opinion 88
- What s global problems and how the government should solve them 85
- What s global problems and how the government should solve them 88
- It is important for children to study a film at school to learn literature To what extent do you agree or disagree 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9010989011 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36804771161 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3725499551 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.25 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346328576202 0.242375264174 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111174023987 0.0925447433944 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427307278044 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178251823789 0.151781067708 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0122162065842 0.0609392437508 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.24 11.5310837438 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.57 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.