The university will deduct the students' score for late assignments. Opinion and solutions?
Recently, the phenomenon of deducting students' scores and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of n is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that late assignments can be a plus, and I will examine that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, students' scores can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that top universities, as well as colleges, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of getting students' scores. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and doing your homework apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, written assignments might increase the consequences of educational policies. Moreover, unique aspects of talented pupils relate to this reality that the demerits of schoolchildren' grades pertain to late assignments. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of university students is correlated negatively with learning lessons. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of having your homework.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of deducting students' marks far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of education systems prove the significance of clever pupils, but also pinpoint educational needs implications.
- The university will deduct the students' score for late assignments. Opinion and solutions? 88
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children). 56
- “In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed’: Does a common man suffer from a group’s ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples. 55
- Medical technology is responsiblefor the human's life expectancy. Towhat extent do you agree ordisagree? 77
- agree or disagree: actions speak louder than words 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71031746032 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25761265138 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670634920635 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3658458906 50.4703680194 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.916666667 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204024104706 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596040946082 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541130850834 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106391000036 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309749894004 0.0609392437508 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.82 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.