What are the advantages and disadvantages of living in an era in which new things are constantly being invented?
Recently, the phenomenon of "the advantages and disadvantages of living in an era in which new things are constantly being invented" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that inventions might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that living in a society with new technologies can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the economics standpoint, living in an era in which new things are constantly being invented can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that more income and producing new inventions are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the advantages of recent inventions on families' earnings. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both useful inventions and providing facilities distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of environment preservation, without the slightest doubt, living in an era with new inventions might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of environmental problems. Moreover, fundamental aspects of sophisticated devices can relate to the reality that the demerits of modern technologies can pertain to human desires. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of the modern era were correlated positively with being carbon neutral, the local authorities would ultimately address climate change. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of global warming.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of living in an era in which new things are constantly being invented far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-23 | navneet sidhu | 77 | view |
| 2020-07-19 | sattar_iust | 85 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | maniram vicky | 83 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-09-10 | dalwindergill | 11 | view |
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 78
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- We have entered a throw away society and fill the environment with rubbish What are the causes and what are your solutions 88
- Rather than choose a subject that is suitable for future employment possibilities you should choose a subject that you interested in or could get good grades Agree or disagree 83
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73559322034 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29871441709 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589830508475 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.895215139 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.818181818 104.977214359 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8181818182 20.9669160288 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.507900254749 0.242375264174 210% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173901188524 0.0925447433944 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161740025875 0.071462118173 226% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.324904260804 0.151781067708 214% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10801586025 0.0609392437508 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 12.6369458128 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.81 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.