Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree?OrExperience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree.

Essay topics:

Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree?
Or
Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree.

Recently, the phenomenon of new way of learning and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although, contested by many that experimental education is highly beneficial for society and educational system. I am inclined to believe that practical education helps to buildup long lasting knowledge and skills, such issue is regarded thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals, which is actually a plus, and I will analyse it throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, the formal education can provide the society with some noticeable fact that learning methods and educational system, are inextricably bound up. According to my experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment about experimental education methods which revealed using books and documents were still popular among authorities.Thus, beneficial ramification of both life skills and excellent books apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, learning through theoretical education might increase the detrimental effects on students later life. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of practical educational method prepares the students and graduates for their career. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted graduates who had the practical education has an increased job offer by 50%.Additionally, students also has a long term memory through new way of learning. Furthermore, these student also had a better career and lifestyle. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of better career opportunities.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, the benefit of experimental education method far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do advantage of this type of prove the significance of rigid rule but also pinpoint job implications.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-04-23 AkashPTEnikalo 88 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user santo :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat practical education helps to buildup long lasting knowledge and skills, such ...
^^
Line 2, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...formal education can provide the society with some noticeable fact that learning ...
^^
Line 2, column 389, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thus
...ts were still popular among authorities.Thus, beneficial ramification of both life s...
^^^^
Line 2, column 442, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ial ramification of both life skills and excellent books apparently can be seen. ...
^^
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Additionally
...ation has an increased job offer by 50%.Additionally, students also has a long term memory t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 520, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this student' or 'these students'?
Suggestion: this student; these students
...rough new way of learning. Furthermore, these student also had a better career and lifestyle....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 110, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...benefit of experimental education method far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, apparently, but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, still, thus, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81294964029 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3139395798 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636690647482 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.2279868134 50.4703680194 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.666666667 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0839570847407 0.242375264174 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0303728524664 0.0925447433944 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305500757149 0.071462118173 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0502090242425 0.151781067708 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029737423499 0.0609392437508 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.