Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education compared to books?
Recently, the phenomenon of experimental learning can its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of formal education is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that learning through books can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, formal education can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of effective learning, as well as scientific books, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the learning process. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both educational development and children books apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, comparing formal education with book learning might increase the consequences of learning capabilities. Moreover, fundamental aspects of learning procedure can relate to this reality that demerits of storybooks pertain to learning activities. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of school learning can correlate negatively with active learners. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of different experiments.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of leaning categories far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of experimental education prove the significance of formal learning, but also pinpoint novel books implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | manraj123 | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | a.aghyi1989 | 88 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | larkyfan | 85 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | MehdiKhodadadi | 85 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | priyankavs23 | 80 | view |
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 88
- the government should reduce their investment in art, music, and painting. do you agree or disagree? 80
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education compared to books? 85
- Some say that music is as important as other subjects in school to promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84980237154 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2675868052 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640316205534 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1905856637 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.333333333 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394543598663 0.242375264174 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124145557754 0.0925447433944 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867561056719 0.071462118173 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212565463088 0.151781067708 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049815560843 0.0609392437508 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.67 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.