The world is becoming a smaller place because of globalization. Some people dread that culture will inevitably disappear as a result. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of globalization effects and its corresponding imapcts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the significance of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and concequences positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that converting world to smaller place can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, disappearing of culture can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that increasing of communication application, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discoverd current policies. Thus, beneficial ramification of both social networks and traditional custom apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, public culture might increase the consequences of improving social skills. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this common phenomenon.
To be conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of community standards far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes but also pinpiont thorny issues' potential implication.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-06 | venkatesh1018 | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | daniellima126 | 88 | view |
| 2019-04-03 | mohab.elhaddad | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-29 | Kushi | 85 | view |
| 2019-01-21 | Sekhonsaab221@gmail.com | 85 | view |
- Some say that in today's world the value of humanities has been eclipsed by the necessity of preparing for specific wealth-producing careers, such as medicine. Discuss whether you think there is a role in today's changing world for the study of 84
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss the positive and negative impacts of this change. 88
- Climate change is a major concern for governments all around the world. If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which subjects will you choose? 11
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additionally funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.Choose which position you most a 88
- The world’s governments and organizations are facing a lot of issues. Which do you think is the most pressing problem for the inhabitants on our planet and give the solution? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 447, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill analyze that throughout this essay. From a general standpoint, disappearing ...
^^^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eived notion of this common phenomenon. To be conclude, while there are several ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76987447699 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31245481879 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.690376569038 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0005389835 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.363636364 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7272727273 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0859623461216 0.242375264174 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0268218128609 0.0925447433944 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040112762427 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0445696450526 0.151781067708 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190317077398 0.0609392437508 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.42 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.