Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don't know (for example, by giving clothing and food to people who need them) than they were in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples
Most people think that helping other people in terms of fixing their finantial problems was better than today because, in the past, people were more respectful to others. However, personally, I believe that people are more willing to help other people in all respect of life better than ever before. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, thanks to advances in technology, we have made a great deal of progress in community advancement. As a result, we are approaching modern and progressive societies. These advancements help us increase our quality of life as well as life expectancy. Another result of these improvements is that we enhance our kindness and tend to share our possessions with others that need them. My personal experience is a compelling illustration of this. I am living in Tehran, where it is one of the modern cities in the world. In my cities, people have great prosperous lives, and most of them do not have any finantioal issues. So they have a good tendency to give the extra goods that they have in their houses to poor people of our town. Recent research has shown that being wealthy and giving money to poor people are closely related. As a result of this kindness, the average of the poverity in our city is very low than other cities in the world.
Furthermore, helping other people is one of the most important mental charactristics that every member of society seeks to achieve. In this case, the role of governments is very crucial. In fact, they must have plans to create and develop this property in their citizens. Although being kind is a property that everyone likes to have, governments should build and expand charities in entire of their countries to boost it. Therefore, they can simply support and manage it. For instance, assume a city where its governments have a plan to increase the charity houses that help the people who do not have any house, stay there, feed them, and give them primary health services. This city has tended its recidents to be part of this idea, and in the short-term, we can see their floorish.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that nowadays people have a better tendency to help others. This is because of improvements in technology and increasing the quality of life, and governments supporting to give their citizens this idea that they should help others. I would therefore recommend it to other people as well to be kind.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment and not enough time on more serious duties and obligations Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Human activity is making the earth a worse place to live Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 91
- Some parents offer their school age children money for each high grade they get in school Do you think this is a good idea 100
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment and not enough time on more serious duties and obligations Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Some parents offer their school age children money for each high grade mark they get in school Do you think this is a good idea Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2033.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78352941176 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62360432497 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501176470588 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4756271866 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3913043478 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4782608696 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69565217391 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268505902194 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760119002436 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712939594063 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186652343368 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642886018181 0.0645574589148 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.