Creativity is inborn skill or can be developed through learning? your opinion?
Creativity is inborn skill or it can developed through learning was always a debatable topic. Some people believe that it's an inborn thing and while others believe that it comes with practice. I strongly believe that creativity is not inborn and this essay will talk about the reasons why it is not inborn.
To begin with, people can acquire some talents by taking lots of grooming. Because practicing certain things for a long duration makes some people perfect in that concerned activity. Even though some talents can be learned by severe training or practice, it will not make a person perfect in it if the person does not have an inborn taste in it. For example, some sports persons become legend in their respective events only because of their hard work and commitment to the desired goal. This example exemplifies us that hard work plays an important role than inborn skills.
Moreover, we can't say creativity is inborn talent only but it can gained and developed in the early years by a certain education and programs. Some people have the ability to gain it in each stage of their life from personal experiences and lessons taught by parents and teachers. According to Tina See, the executive director of the Stanford Technology Ventures Program, says that's a myth and she believes creativity is a renewable source of energy that we can tap into at any time and it's a process that can be learned and taught. Finally, it is the responsible to find out the hidden talents of their child and encourage them to choose a career in which they were more creative.
According to the points discussed, one can reach out to point that even though if we get creativity as inborn that can be groomed only through practice and hard work. In a nutshell, it can be concluded that creativity is not an inborn talent and that can achieved through dedication and encouragement from parents.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-04-02 | Onepunchman | 77 | view |
2020-05-11 | Kanika Aggarwal | 77 | view |
2020-01-29 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
2020-01-24 | jashan randhawa | 55 | view |
2019-12-30 | gupta-vikas | 55 | view |
- technology and new inventions is it beneficial or detrimental to the society? 80
- Should government build more road to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport? 92
- Experience is a more effective way to teach compared to books Agree or disagree 78
- The belching and unauthorized behavior is unacceptable in modern offices How far you support this view Give your response with justification 83
- Should marketing for consumer goods companies like clothing and food focus on reputation or on short term strategies like discount and special offers? Why? 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 38, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'develop'
Suggestion: develop
Creativity is inborn skill or it can developed through learning was always a debatable...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ole than inborn skills. Moreover, we cant say creativity is inborn talent only bu...
^^^^
Line 5, column 67, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'gain'
Suggestion: gain
...tivity is inborn talent only but it can gained and developed in the early years by a c...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 378, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...nford Technology Ventures Program, says thats a myth and she believes creativity is a...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 488, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...gy that we can tap into at any time and its a process that can be learned and taugh...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, moreover, so, while, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 8.36945812808 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 37.0 20.9802955665 176% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 326.0 242.827586207 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80674846626 5.00649968141 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51304137313 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539877300613 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 488.7 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.116418105 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.928571429 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 7.25397266985 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348518076875 0.242375264174 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132100134778 0.0925447433944 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14049028385 0.071462118173 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236750432563 0.151781067708 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100299956459 0.0609392437508 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.1260098522 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.5310837438 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.