The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The three pie charts illustrate how much a specific UK school cost in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
According to the three charts, it is clearly to see that the total school spending was made up of 5 parts. Obviously, the maximum proportion of total school spending was teacher’s salaries. Although there was a decrease between 1991 and 2001, the percentage of teacher’ salaries still grew from 40% to 45%. Different from the changes of staff’s salaries, the percentage of furniture and equipment spending increase sharply in 2001 after a fall from 15% to 5%, despite of that, the year 2001 still saw a growth with 8%。 We can also see that the proportion of insurance cost, which was still the smallest part of the total spending, went up marginally from 2% in 1981 to 8% in 2001.
On the contrary, there was a noticeable decline in the cost of other workers’ salaries, which was from 28% to 15%. The charges of resources spending was totally the same as that of other workers’ salaries spending, while the proportion of resources cost first grew up from 15% in 1981 to 20% in 1991, and then fell down to 9% in 2001.
Overall, the spending of insurance was the smallest part of cost to the school, though there was a slightly increase. In contrast, the cost of teachers’ salaries still the biggest part of total school spending.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Sandhu param | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 33 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 67 | view |
- The pie chart below shows where energy is used in a typical Australian household and the table shows the amount of eletricity used according to the number of occupants Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 69
- Most people accept that we now live in a globalised world but not everyone agree that this is benefit.To what extent is globalisation a positive or negative development? 32
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 67
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different citid s between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. 84
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...of cost to the school, though there was a slightly increase. In contrast, the cost of teachers&apos...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, still, then, while, as to, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1130.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82905982906 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80074658967 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491452991453 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 90.4138632438 43.030603864 210% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 125.555555556 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222536939033 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119817529285 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114477879436 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18774160936 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142078004703 0.0819641961636 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.